From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 6 08:46:04 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3658C16A41A; Sat, 6 Oct 2007 08:46:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [209.31.154.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1734013C457; Sat, 6 Oct 2007 08:46:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [209.31.154.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89AB347955; Sat, 6 Oct 2007 04:46:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 09:46:03 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Tim Kientzle In-Reply-To: <4706F5C4.4070301@freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20071006094251.H19939@fledge.watson.org> References: <4705CA47.9090101@delphij.net> <20071005214506.X88717@fledge.watson.org> <4706F5C4.4070301@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Aryeh Friedman , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, d@delphij.net Subject: Re: viral license free fork of freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2007 08:46:04 -0000 On Fri, 5 Oct 2007, Tim Kientzle wrote: >> It's not clear this is comprehensive, but it may still be useful in >> discussing replacing GPL'd components with non-GPL'd ones: >> >> http://wiki.freebsd.org/ContribSoftware > > Should we add a column indicating possible alternatives? Certainly. > For example, I'm working on a new cpio now, Kai Wang is working on binutils, > and I'm sure there are other projects in the works. > > I agree with other folks who have picked out GNU readline as probably the > most troublesome. The other GPL-licensed tools are generally separate > applications that could be fairly easily dropped from any particular > application (embedded applications probably don't need to distribute gdb or > gcc, for instance). For embedded systems, a non-GPL gdbserver might be useful. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge