From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Aug 23 19:26:40 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA01880 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Sun, 23 Aug 1998 19:26:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from localhost.my.domain (ppp1567.on.bellglobal.com [206.172.249.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA01875 for ; Sun, 23 Aug 1998 19:26:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hoek@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from localhost (tim@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id WAA01153; Sun, 23 Aug 1998 22:25:19 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from ac199@hwcn.org) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: tim owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 22:25:18 -0400 (EDT) From: Tim Vanderhoek X-Sender: tim@localhost Reply-To: ac199@hwcn.org To: Andrey Zakhvatov cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /usr/X11R6 vs /usr/local In-Reply-To: <199808180622.KAA01752@icc.surw.chel.su> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org [Since I don't recall anyone answering this...] On Tue, 18 Aug 1998, Andrey Zakhvatov wrote: > If right, why not convert some ports to ${X11BASE} layout and follow > this rules more strictly? (I mean, for example, KDE). It's difficult to make strict rules for this, I think. I think it's best to install into whichever is easiest. If both ${LOCALBASE} and ${X11BASE} are equally easy to use, then use ${LOCALBASE}. -- This .sig is not innovative, witty, or profund. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message