From owner-freebsd-net Tue Feb 19 5:24: 6 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from smtp.uc3m.es (smtp03.uc3m.es [163.117.136.123]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01EB637B417 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 05:24:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp03.uc3m.es (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 719254316F for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 14:23:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from lmserv2.lab.it.uc3m.es (lmserv2.lab.it.uc3m.es [163.117.144.152]) by smtp03.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DFF999DE3 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 14:23:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from it.uc3m.es (alacran.it.uc3m.es [163.117.139.44]) by lmserv2.lab.it.uc3m.es (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA01526 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 14:23:53 +0100 Message-ID: <3C7251E9.4B250385@it.uc3m.es> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 14:23:53 +0100 From: Juan Francisco Rodriguez Hervella X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lista Subject: NAT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello, I have been doing some perfomance tests using the standard NAT implementation for FreeBsd, and also using NAT-PT, with the KAME implementation. In throughput and delay terms, the results are much worse for NAT4. May that result be due to the overloading introduced by ALG in the standard implementation? Maybe it has to analyse the packets deeper?? Thanks in advance. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message