From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Nov 4 12:59:18 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from nu.nu.cuk.nu (node.050.lc.link.si [212.30.95.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5705637B479 for ; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 12:59:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from cuk.nu (cuk.localnet [192.168.6.11]) by nu.nu.cuk.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6CB61AB23 for ; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 22:00:39 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <3A0478AF.A5E69FF9@cuk.nu> Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2000 21:59:27 +0100 From: Marko Cuk X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Stability References: <20001104142553.X37870@jade.chc-chimes.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello !! Can anyone explain me, why is FreeBSD known as powerful sistem with industrial strenghth and rock stability, but I manage to crash it several times. The bridge code in 4.1x is unstable in conjuction with ipfw, I had several problems with Vinum and Raid5 and maschine crashed every day if I used something od previously mentioned things. I came from Linux world, wich was unlikely for me, but Linux never crashed on my maschines. My average uptime was 100 days with bridge, with raid5 and so on.... This is not a threat or something, but I am curious, why FBSD crashes in such manners. I also managed to run Vinum twice by mistake, but, again, maschine crashed. Thanks, Marko Cuk To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message