From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 5 13:20:13 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E293037B401 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 13:20:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88DC843F85 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 13:20:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h55KKDUp083821 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 13:20:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h55KKDhM083820; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 13:20:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 13:20:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200306052020.h55KKDhM083820@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Kirk Strauser Subject: Re: ports/52790: New port: shells/bash-completion X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Kirk Strauser List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 20:20:14 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/52790; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Kirk Strauser To: Sergey Matveychuk Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/52790: New port: shells/bash-completion Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 15:17:05 -0500 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable At 2003-06-04T14:36:19Z, Sergey Matveychuk writes: > I'v fixed patch-aa, added depends on shell/bash2, fixed pkg-message > and tested. Regarding the corrupted archive: Thanks for fixing that. It worked correctly on my system before using the "shar" command to create the archive, but I don't know enough about that command to get it to do the right thing. Regarding the shells/bash2 dependency: Should it be dependent on bash2? While I agree that it's mostly useless without bash2, isn't there a possibility that it could be regarded as documentation, or used with a Linux bash from one of the linux_base installations? Regarding the pkg-message: I tried to copy-and-paste from the pkg-message files from other ports that were apparently done incorrectly. Thanks for putting me on the right track. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+36VE5sRg+Y0CpvERAsVIAKCePyqm6LNvxU5UHSLjUahrOq9myQCgj+vK Z09XPytyRGYGs7UYFU4gc1o= =w0dW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--