From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Wed Dec 27 12:47:44 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEB3EE8B242; Wed, 27 Dec 2017 12:47:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EA10642C8; Wed, 27 Dec 2017 12:47:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1354) id D297E129AC; Wed, 27 Dec 2017 12:47:43 +0000 (UTC) From: Jan Beich To: Alexey Dokuchaev Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r457360 - head/Mk/Uses References: <201712271041.vBRAfUnn041527@repo.freebsd.org> <20171227104922.GA83619@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 13:47:35 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20171227104922.GA83619@FreeBSD.org> (Alexey Dokuchaev's message of "Wed, 27 Dec 2017 10:49:22 +0000") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 12:47:44 -0000 Alexey Dokuchaev writes: > On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 10:41:30AM +0000, Jan Beich wrote: > >> New Revision: 457360 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/457360 >> >> Log: >> Update USES=compiler:c++14-lang to Clang 5.0 on FreeBSD 10 > > What was the reason behind this change? Do we really need a reason to update? ;) Here's an incomplete list: - Many projects don't care about old compilers; Clang support is usually driven by OS X and ASan users - Clang 4.0 is no longer maintained upstream; unlike GCC maintenance cycles are very short (around half a year) - FreeBSD 11.2 (aka /stable/11) and FreeBSD 12.0 (aka /head) already use Clang 5.0 in base - devel/llvm50 can build more ports with -flto=thin -fuse-ld=lld - Better C++17 support but still incomplete due to old libc++ in base - Mesa switched to llvm50 in r457264 -> less build dependencies - www/firefox switched to llvm50 in r457267 -> less build dependencies > Why on FreeBSD 10, what about 11 and 12-CURRENT? USES=compiler:c++14-lang is nop for FreeBSD 11 or later because Clang is new enough to support C++14. To be removed after FreeBSD 10.* reaches EOL. Architectures stuck with GCC don't differentiate between C++11 and C++14 capable compiler.