From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 24 02:39:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D2AD16A41F for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 02:39:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AA0A43D5F for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 02:39:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B64F1A3C1C; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 18:39:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 534CC519E7; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 21:39:28 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 21:39:28 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Wojciech Puchar Message-ID: <20051124023928.GA13075@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20051124013438.T8326@chylonia.3miasto.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051124013438.T8326@chylonia.3miasto.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: so much clock interrupts?! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 02:39:30 -0000 --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 01:35:41AM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > that's what i see in systat with FreeBSD 6.0/i386-SMP >=20 >=20 > 540 534 99 pdwak 2000 cpu= 0:=20 > time > 16825 pdpgs 2000 cpu= 1:=20 > time >=20 >=20 > on FreeBSD 5.3 live CD i have 100 not 2000 times per second >=20 > isn't it too much?! No, it's just a consequence of HZ=3D1000 instead of HZ=3D100. I've measured this carefully and I can't see it causing a penalty on my workloads. It apparently gives a benefit on machines that do a lot of network I/O. Kris --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDhSffWry0BWjoQKURAi+EAJ92xjXMJfU+4kknmmNZYM6A+OZD4QCffgxS Mjeyz7sVnmBEverLq0O9qR0= =3D++ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI--