From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 21 20:34:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60A4016A41F for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 20:34:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF9DB43D46 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 20:34:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6450C5D41; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:34:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 67059-05; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:34:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [10.1.1.209] (nfw1.codefab.com [199.103.21.225]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAD075C6F; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:34:33 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <200509211329.54314.kstewart@owt.com> References: <20050921202013.15670.qmail@web53305.mail.yahoo.com> <200509211329.54314.kstewart@owt.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v734) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <15D7BC57-66ED-48E7-BF90-070D6B5F324C@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:34:13 -0400 To: Kent Stewart X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.734) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: pls help for ipfw X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 20:34:36 -0000 On Sep 21, 2005, at 4:29 PM, Kent Stewart wrote: >> my box is running freebsd5.4 with natd and ipfw >> >> I have problem about ipfw rule for internal users to >> access outside tftp server > > Did you allow tcp 20 & 21 for ftp. FTP and TFTP aren't the same thing. Also, if the original poster is using NAT, you have to coordinate settings in the natd configuration to punch holes dynamicly for the FTP data channel, see the example posted yesterday from the thread "Re: IPFW2+NAT stateful rules VS. FTP"... -- -Chuck