From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Thu Jul 9 07:12:31 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB143362652; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 07:12:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gljennjohn@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wr1-x441.google.com (mail-wr1-x441.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::441]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B2S6l3tCLz4clc; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 07:12:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gljennjohn@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wr1-x441.google.com with SMTP id o11so1149775wrv.9; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 00:12:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ackSYQbL9MTogbWok5vhIppW+0L6+rP/YtQRxFskLh4=; b=b1Q0+K5M0+TfEOt7xpRxaI96wqUU8BJaQkZrjLB2JATXBI247eyULderZ9jpafr6gk Kx6KgtF4rCucQUV+YUBphJ0HwxYTEczKmoNiglL81xGss51OOhTlzWrq7nyhoG4pZIXX usMNx8nXevrnz8osVp79d4Y15c7fTgK/S9WfC8BMRFn8MQc65Ygdg/ZBJYxn8B9KIvtR WDTHOWpUzr0hTEzB4KSPa5zGnTJCuEaB7+lE+vo0dVECIvLKoLqu+m8fy3/D9CMCGP2O b1m/HzAldMNVKR1J6przrOSJ9G5h53lYkyvBvIUfLGa9z2Q1OOvQONoQm/yUCgU4FixC V3Sw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ackSYQbL9MTogbWok5vhIppW+0L6+rP/YtQRxFskLh4=; b=sef6TWLOMKTJSld2GzrobfBN7PCjS7oqANLC0tfzOE1eHm2In5sE06TncUNi5XwNhH TUqMjFxb/Sw5NEQ8HKUsvWNQzAtaounGFt1zCVjoslhshH1dSgiy/Kbw3tlzv2JJcpEV dPY1xn9GVyATFPFdh1hlNNWVUx3fwPnnkNMwNyQRntKac257rYxq6cqpZubgBUdR6I1S IEvqxkkjEF3cSc70QqGoh5L3PP8EFwUx9dw/xoKgFA+bTfNtnrpmWIpV10vyE62So7oS wz94jEcnvPhq7psH3fj7eS55opKQRVV+cs58pfv3e84hJ1DBOAh4T07mh4n/PcW01CxX zorA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530BDdnO+4wqOY3RE0uhnMzSHMF4YrlS+3ri7kqwe+uIAkbwCihf UpThfkqtIFUnZw7sO78e/8I= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxbldNLOoWGJ6QKlJPtf86Ma5SRCqrma+IcGUfRevyzv8oyNwvvCJL4oNqEndarQIeVi5Bw5Q== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4bc8:: with SMTP id l8mr60643384wrt.159.1594278750327; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 00:12:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ernst.home (p5b02341c.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [91.2.52.28]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x185sm3512371wmg.41.2020.07.09.00.12.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 09 Jul 2020 00:12:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 09:12:28 +0200 From: Gary Jennejohn To: Marcelo Araujo Cc: araujo@freebsd.org, "Rodney W. Grimes" , Ernie Luzar , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD current Subject: Re: ipv6_ipfilter_rules= is obsolete ? Message-ID: <20200709091228.1d07d6f5@ernst.home> In-Reply-To: References: <5F064B4F.5040006@gmail.com> <202007082334.068NY9QQ088738@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Reply-To: gljennjohn@gmail.com X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.5 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd13.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4B2S6l3tCLz4clc X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2020 07:12:31 -0000 On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 10:27:02 +0800 Marcelo Araujo wrote: > Em qui., 9 de jul. de 2020 __s 07:34, Rodney W. Grimes < > freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> escreveu: > > > > In /etc/defaults/rc.conf I see this > > > > > > ipv6_ipfilter_rules="/etc/ipf6.rules" > > > # rules definition file for ipfilter, > > > # see /usr/src/contrib/ipfilter/rules for examples > > > > > > man 8 ipf says > > > > > > ipf -6 ipv4 and ipv6 rules are stored in a single table and can be read > > > from a single file. This option is no longer required to load ipv6 rules. > > > > > > I interrupt this to mean that the ipv6_ipfilter_rules="/etc/ipf6.rules" > > > line in /etc/defaults/rc.conf is obsolete and should be removed > > > before RELEASE 13.0 is published for users to use. > > > > Interesting, though I would not remove it. It should be marked as > > depricated and the /etc/rc.d/ipfilter shell script updated to emit > > a warning that it is depricated, but it should still be processed > > to retain backwards compatibility and NOT lock someone out of a > > system who has just done an upgrade to a newer version. > > > > Do you mean deprecated or depricated? > Got confused here! Sorry English is hard for non-native speakers. > It's a typo - he meant deprecated. -- Gary Jennejohn