Date: Wed, 6 Sep 1995 12:20:32 +1000 From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: peter@taronga.com, terry@lambert.org Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bad superblock? Message-ID: <199509060220.MAA31925@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>If you'll rememebr, the clean flag wasn't in 1.x, so a "1.x fsck" will >(correctly) fsck each time the system is booted. The clean flag was in 1.1.5. It is one of the fields that isn't compared with the alternate superblock. Forcing the comparison not to see differences in the clean flag is the only support for the clean flag in 1.1.5. The 1.1.5 fsck fails on file systems that have been used under 2.x because sees something _other_ than the clean flag being different. Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199509060220.MAA31925>