From owner-freebsd-current Mon Nov 15 14:18:25 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E5EF14BCA; Mon, 15 Nov 1999 14:18:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id OAA45512; Mon, 15 Nov 1999 14:18:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 14:18:24 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <199911152218.OAA45512@apollo.backplane.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PATCH for testing References: <22209.942703421@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :http://phk.freebsd.dk/misc/p_args.patch : :The p_args.patch patch implements a cache of the commandline arguments :in the process structure and makes ps(1) pick it up from there with :sysctl rather than by groping around in the target process memory. : :This patch: : Speeds up ps(1). Why don't we get rid of the 'e' option to ps while we are at it considering how much of a security hole it is. I've never liked the 'e' option. -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message