From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jan 28 09:32:45 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA16065 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 09:32:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from imap.ncsa.es (nexus.es [194.179.50.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA16060 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 09:32:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jesusr@ncsa.es) Received: from piolin.ncsa.es (piolin.ncsa.es [194.179.50.134]) by imap.ncsa.es (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id SAA12531; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 18:32:34 +0100 (CET) Reply-To: "Jesus Rodriguez" From: "Jesus Rodriguez" To: Cc: Subject: RE: Your opinion please! Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 18:34:05 +0100 Message-ID: <01be4ae4$66e16900$8632b3c2@piolin.ncsa.es> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.1712.3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >In some cases Apache proxy capabilities are enough and squid is >overkill. I mean older machines with small amount of memory. I >believe squid needs more memory than apache, maybe I'm mistaken, god >knows... Yes... for old/small machines maybe but for good/big proxies (and networked sibling/parent proxies), squid is much better (imho). :) We have proxies from 2Gb to 30Gb with squid and they work very, very well. JesusR. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message