Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 18:37:14 -0600 From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) To: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/icu Makefile distinfo pkg-plist ports/devel/icu/files patch-enum-bug patch-install patch-intltest patch-putil Message-ID: <20080208003714.GA11930@soaustin.net> In-Reply-To: <1202424131.80678.21.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> References: <200802070531.m175VikU015939@repoman.freebsd.org> <200802071629.34089.mi%2Bmill@aldan.algebra.com> <20080208073029.3291b675.nork@FreeBSD.org> <200802071738.20992.mi%2Bmill@aldan.algebra.com> <1202424131.80678.21.camel@ikaros.oook.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mikhail Teterin píše v čt 07. 02. 2008 v 17:38 -0500: > Why can't the package-building infrastructure put the > two-and-two together and figure out, that the dependent ports need > rebuilding /without/ explicit PORTREVISION bump? Whether it can or should, the point that's being missed is that right now, it doesn't. Therefore, the port version bumps are necessary. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080208003714.GA11930>