From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Nov  6 13:13:57 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: hackers@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFE5B14C
 for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Wed,  6 Nov 2013 13:13:57 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from joerg@britannica.bec.de)
Received: from mo6-p00-ob.rzone.de (mo6-p00-ob.rzone.de
 [IPv6:2a01:238:20a:202:5300::1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 768C32E3B
 for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Wed,  6 Nov 2013 13:13:57 +0000 (UTC)
X-RZG-AUTH: :JiIXek6mfvEEUpFQdo7Fj1/zg48CFjWjQv0cW+St/nW/afgnrylsiWy0bTV9rgkJ
X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00
Received: from britannica.bec.de
 (ip-109-45-222-180.web.vodafone.de [109.45.222.180])
 by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 32.11 DYNA|AUTH)
 with (TLSv1.0:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA id L03aedpA6CpbdF ;
 Wed, 6 Nov 2013 14:13:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: by britannica.bec.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation);
 Wed, 06 Nov 2013 14:13:43 +0100
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 14:13:43 +0100
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@britannica.bec.de>
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Importing netbsd cdb
Message-ID: <20131106131343.GA28180@britannica.bec.de>
Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, hackers@FreeBSD.org
References: <20131027232628.GB74512@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
 <20131105220225.GF37879@caravan.chchile.org>
 <20131106084550.GA21489@ass.pp.htv.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20131106084550.GA21489@ass.pp.htv.fi>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
 <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 13:13:57 -0000

On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 10:45:50AM +0200, Atte Peltomaki wrote:
> At least randomly googled third-party benchmarks suggest that CDB is
> vastly superior to BDB:
> http://www.dmo.ca/blog/benchmarking-hash-databases-on-large-data/

Please note that the term "CDB" is somewhat overloaded, e.g. there are a
number of completely different implementations and file formats.

Joerg