From owner-freebsd-mobile Mon Nov 3 23:12:30 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA18249 for mobile-outgoing; Mon, 3 Nov 1997 23:12:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-mobile) Received: from word.smith.net.au (vh1.gsoft.com.au [203.38.152.122]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA18240 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 1997 23:12:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@word.smith.net.au) Received: from word.smith.net.au (localhost.gsoft.com.au [127.0.0.1]) by word.smith.net.au (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA01681; Tue, 4 Nov 1997 17:38:26 +1030 (CST) Message-Id: <199711040708.RAA01681@word.smith.net.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: Warner Losh cc: freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Libretto 50 - US Version and PAO In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 04 Nov 1997 00:03:10 PDT." <199711040703.AAA03199@harmony.village.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 04 Nov 1997 17:38:26 +1030 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > In message <199711030653.RAA01957@word.smith.net.au> Mike Smith writes: > : Just following on a discussion with Nate about the whole IRQ-in-CIS > : thing; can you throw the 'pccard dumpcis' output for your '589 this > : way, as well as the configuration index that you're currently using? > > Further experimentation has shown that the irq makes no difference at > all. What really did matter was the i/o range. The range 0x240-0x2e0 > was what caused the problems. After removing that range of addresses > and adding irqs, I was able to bring up the card on irq 10, 11 and 15. Gotcha. Want to bet there's something at 0x240? Nate; you're the last source of "the IRQ matters" evidence - can we reevaluate this when you're free to test your set? mike