From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 17 16:08:25 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D12245 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 16:08:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from eu1sys200aog118.obsmtp.com (eu1sys200aog118.obsmtp.com [207.126.144.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA170AE5 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 16:08:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com ([209.85.212.173]) (using TLSv1) by eu1sys200aob118.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP ID DSNKUebBcksbQUbcO2Xkkjxr94Yo3WmuVBOT@postini.com; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 16:08:24 UTC Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id hq4so5625330wib.12 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:08:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:message-id:to:subject:cc:reply-to :x-gm-message-state; bh=kednhSqKrT+WQBD8Zj/cLLKdW6u8CT37fbV7PXMJtjU=; b=mFRKWnSmorYvrZQv9CEGKQcgOjwpOlYfJ8s8AbZR84yijCNmvfvzTQdJHy8AB+X9eN FrsBq4eG5+JhG0vZp5lZlq86pXwmBcWh3FVg/nGjQVz52MU1l4Z2LF/IWPQ+ZMDfJ62Z XZb7lDmmkzipWEZaYexki+cWs8yXJ7TzEDdGJ5LjYxRifir3s0xHSHuewzf8yxq7NINH qN6UfZuBMpgJ2J/G7G4HSy9WPPsL8S0POdfxJsiqFX7mnUPPdSeXEGK5gucXpj3uEhIc /MbPmV/rwM+phqDojXqwFnS5RVGKtVri/mwCyKRl11eVa26+teYS/61acVySl9R1LD2I Ynqw== X-Received: by 10.180.206.70 with SMTP id lm6mr16418868wic.50.1374077298401; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:08:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.206.70 with SMTP id lm6mr16418865wic.50.1374077298337; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:08:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk. [137.222.187.241]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id d8sm10730915wiz.0.2013.07.17.09.08.16 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:08:17 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Anton Shterenlikht Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.7/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r6HG8FgL022827 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 17 Jul 2013 17:08:15 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.7/8.14.6/Submit) id r6HG8Eo2022826; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 17:08:14 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas) Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 17:08:14 +0100 (BST) From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201307171608.r6HG8Eo2022826@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> To: fortran@freebsd.org Subject: objections to MAINTAINER=fortran@ in devel/fpp X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmdvldQSFMOQlIyv7E+uZxUjaKVJUOTza3SRWlNMNvtxs4+xNVdQ9EZHbbyVmsin2swrvjKRyLDQQFuDL6uqpk9zoMwZp4gl5HG9q5AwEByTxvFchVQX+UlM1JNkKoq9O9lB4S7y5OTpgMQ0Qcq+bVBDXfJeQ+PppEPvzRtQeMRfKM1N7Q= Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 16:08:25 -0000 (copy to ports@ in case some users of devel/fpp are not on fortran@) devel/fpp is a Fortran pre-processor. It is unmaintained. I think fortran@ list is the most logical maintainer. Any objections? Anton P.S. I just updated devel/fpp to conform to the latest ports framework. The port is old, but builds and works. However, I don't really use it, so don't want to maintain it myself.