From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 28 08:48:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8D86106564A for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 08:48:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FC7D8FC0A for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 08:48:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so2870394bwz.13 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 01:48:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=BRQl2VSSvTT4QqAGXf+8BFZtyVBpoE/1N5vdiR+zPYQ=; b=MpechPMXwgPhZkX5uJebFE2FExEXknhWHWqCs6vR4H85u0uFzUyY20/ZFE0m6jSQ8A WIROx+4b+PWUmoLHe90zvBEl8OpRpKLNZk+5lvvdGkBsLjXI2AFBWNrJAr3IOJsH8PIC y1s1pJkqCJP97oLIegmGf3Xl6nAKgdXHnZpI0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=m9DoBMrXM9hF7ZcjrslxwUIcPx1CX9RgyP06oshcMasizFfI1QNNCgTGrHaQ1owHds yJnHJ/uctrFKQ2uu/slVDb9VPGG8nQza/D8P3VH4rZ2MEa8PRJ9yHHocgcGNPaXjFKVm uVa7RLCiDXpPWenpZnui9CppTl0mC6ON6sgmY= Received: by 10.204.180.80 with SMTP id bt16mr3434150bkb.184.1301302094243; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 01:48:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Melon.malikania.fr (wifi-osiris-sec-183-249.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.183.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id rb14sm2479023bkb.9.2011.03.28.01.48.12 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 28 Mar 2011 01:48:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4D904AFF.1070707@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:46:55 +0200 From: David Demelier User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110306 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20110327184837.GA36228@owl.midgard.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: why vim ports have personal KNOBS for options X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 08:48:16 -0000 On 27/03/2011 21:40, Subbsd wrote: > On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:48 PM, Erik Trulsson wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:19:44PM +0400, Subbsd wrote: >>> Ive wanted to ask why the option of vim port has not yet been handed >>> via dialog by default. Personally, to make them work, we must define >>> WITH_OPTIONS=yes in make.conf (or WITH_VIM_OPTIONS=yes). Life without >>> it is so difficult ;) >> >> Because the maintainer of the vim port has a dislike for the OPTIONS >> framework. >> > > > I expected to hear that just so happened historically. ôext question I > ask only to satisfy my interest. What OPTIONS framework basically can > someone not like it? > ãhat are the disadvantages compared to " grep define > /usr/ports///Makefile "? Maybe the other of > thousand maintainrs something not know about it? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" bapt@ made a proposal to improve the OPTION framework and it will be reviewed by portmgr@ soon. This will include a improvment that obrien@ disliked much : when you have WITHOUT_NLS=true in your /etc/make.conf any port that use OPTIONS framework will not honour this knob and this is obviously painful. The bapt@ patch correct this, so the the new OPTION framework will read these KNOBS (but of course there is more coming) Cheers, -- David Demelier