From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 3 12:44:18 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17EDF106564A for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 12:44:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-fs@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2AE38FC08 for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 12:44:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RLweV-00083L-2o for freebsd-fs@freebsd.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 13:44:15 +0100 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 13:44:15 +0100 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 13:44:15 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 13:43:58 +0100 Lines: 45 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigDE943E0C91F6804A6A260F63" X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111004 Thunderbird/7.0.1 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Subject: Re: Default inode number too low in FFS nowadays? X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 12:44:18 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigDE943E0C91F6804A6A260F63 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/11/2011 12:57, Borja Marcos wrote: >=20 > Hi >=20 > Today I=C2=B4ve come across an issue long ago forgotten :) Running out = of i-nodes. Actually, nowadays I mostly *reduce* the number of inodes rather than increasing it, since I often have large files and want to reduce fsck time (but that's a corner case). > Looking at the number of i-nodes per /usr subdirectory, I have noticed = that, wow! /usr/ports consumes A LOT of them.=20 >=20 > freebsd9-borja# find . -print | wc -l > 405481 Did you forget to do "make clean" after "make install" on several large ports? But yes, the ports tree is getting a bit unwieldy. On the other hand, did you fsck the file system lately? --------------enigDE943E0C91F6804A6A260F63 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6yjI4ACgkQldnAQVacBcgwFQCgzZaYjuDXmhphJXDTPd5zc6GD 3wUAn3v+6IPYYppjlSt61dP65q86Gu+b =2uRS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigDE943E0C91F6804A6A260F63--