From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 26 13:09:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8209D16A4CE for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 13:09:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 343AD43D72 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 13:09:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 80so175348rnk for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 06:09:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.8.46 with SMTP id 46mr2651722rnh; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 06:09:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.206.18 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 06:09:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 18:39:30 +0530 From: Subhro To: FreeBSD-questions In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: cc: Marc van Woerkom Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE and Windows XP on one system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Subhro List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 13:09:34 -0000 On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:08:42 +0200, Marc van Woerkom wrote: > >Well FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p9 is running on my box with > >Windiws XP in > >dual boot. So the installation definitely works. > > Ok, that is already a good hint. > What boot manager do you use for that dual boot system? > > I use the FreeBSD boot manager which comes with the system. > >First of all, have u > >fixed the master > >drive at the end of the cable and the slave drive in the > >middle > >connector?. > > I need to check that. I did not know about such a > preference, and assumed both connectors are equal. > For Winshit (read Windows) or Linshit (read Linux), they are indeed equal, but as I indicated, FreeBSD is *very* *very* fussy about hardware. So you need to maintain that order. > > >probability you have already guessed. Yes it may be the > >BIOS. Its a > >good move to search the manufacturer site for updated > >BIOS and flash > >it. However be careful. > > Perhaps I better try to get a newer board.. but then I > need newer ram, newer proc.. the usual upgrade madness. :) > > > Thirdly, I would say put the 40G > >drive as > >master as olders drives have buggy controller firmware > >and they *may* > >create troubles in case of newer slaves. > > OK, I'll try that. > > >Fourtly, Jumper > >the drives > >explicitly to be master and slave. Do not rely on the CS. > > I hope, I did that. But I check. > > Thanks a lot for the hints! > Marc > Let us know if that worked out. -- Subhro Sankha Kar School of Information Technology Block AQ-13/1 Sector V ZIP 700091 India