From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jan 3 13:16:52 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA08630 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sun, 3 Jan 1999 13:16:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ozz.etrust.ru ([195.2.84.116]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA08619 for ; Sun, 3 Jan 1999 13:16:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from osa@etrust.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ozz.etrust.ru (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA00569; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 00:09:57 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from osa@etrust.ru) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1999 00:09:57 +0300 (MSK) From: oZZ!!! To: Matt Behrens cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: How's the latest -SNAP? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 3 Jan 1999, Matt Behrens wrote: > As smoothly as aout-to-elf seems to be going along, I'm going to > be hitting the sysinstall freshly when I'm ready to move my main > machine to 3.0 in a couple weeks. (Reasoning is too long to go > into here, but they include more garbage than is worth tracking > down from ports that have misbehaved in the past and left files > strewn all about /usr/local as well as the need for a different > partitioning scheme to faciliate new hard drives I'm bringing in.) > > My questions are these: > > 1. Are the SNAPs fully ELF? all SNAPs after 3.0 in ELF > > 2. Are the new bootloaders used? yes & what do think when you say "new bootloaders"? > > 3. What is the shape of installing from the SNAP in general? Any > gotchas? > > TIA. (I couldn't find much from the archives.) > > - Matt "Zigg" Behrens > Network Administrator, zigg.com > Engineer, Nameless IRC Network > Rgdz, Osokin Sergey aka oZZ, osa@etrust.ru To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message