From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan 11 16:42:40 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 50B4416A4CE; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:42:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C19A443D4C; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:42:38 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666)
	id 70D3B5309; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 01:42:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37])
	by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP
	id A04515308; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 01:42:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602)
	id BE7DC33C6A; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 22:35:28 +0100 (CET)
To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
References: <16385.37893.652979.822920@canoe.dclg.ca>
	<14092.1073845446@critter.freebsd.dk>
	<20040111.141505.108953149.imp@bsdimp.com>
From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=)
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 22:35:28 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20040111.141505.108953149.imp@bsdimp.com> (M. Warner Losh's
 message of "Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:15:05 -0700 (MST)")
Message-ID: <xzphdz2qicf.fsf@dwp.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on 
	flood.des.no
X-Spam-Level: sss
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,
	RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK,RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.61
cc: phk@phk.freebsd.dk
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
cc: current@freebsd.org
cc: dgilbert@dclg.ca
Subject: Re: Future of RAIDFrame
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:42:40 -0000

"M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> writes:
> Maybe this would be a good test-case for seeing how well it works?
> Maybe not.  We do need to run a few more test-cases for things through
> this scenario...  I'm not sure this one is well suited to it.

If we toss out Vinum, there's a significant risk that 5.3 will ship
without RAID support at all.  I'm pretty certain we don't want that.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no