From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 27 17:32:19 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E8F16A417 for ; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 17:32:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmw@unete.cl) Received: from mail02.ifxnetworks.com (mail02.ifxnetworks.com [190.61.128.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25B3B13C4B3 for ; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 17:32:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmw@unete.cl) Received: (qmail 31316 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2007 17:32:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO webmail.ifxnw.cl) ([190.61.128.22]) (envelope-sender ) by mail02.ifxnetworks.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 27 Jul 2007 17:32:17 -0000 Received: from 64.117.137.69 (proxying for 161.131.179.196) (SquirrelMail authenticated user dmw@unete.cl) by webmail.ifxnw.cl with HTTP; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:32:17 -0400 (CLT) Message-ID: <54257.64.117.137.69.1185557537.squirrel@webmail.ifxnw.cl> Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:32:17 -0400 (CLT) From: "Daniel Molina Wegener" To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: kevent notes implementation X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dmw@unete.cl List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 17:32:19 -0000 Hello, I was looking the code of kqueue(2)/kevent(2), also the manual pages. Is there any reason why NOTE_OPEN, NOTE_CLOSE and NOTE_READ aren't implemented yet. What may be considered in these KNOTEs implementation? Best regards. -- .O. | Daniel Molina Wegener | C/C++ Developer ..O | dmw [at] unete [dot] cl | FOSS Coding Adict OOO | BSD & Linux User | Standards Rocks!