From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 10 01:16:39 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 534F137B404 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2003 01:16:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freebsd.org.ru (freebsd.org.ru [194.84.67.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B0CE43F93 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2003 01:16:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from osa@freebsd.org.ru) Received: by freebsd.org.ru (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 506801A9; Thu, 10 Jul 2003 12:16:36 +0400 (MSD) Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 12:16:36 +0400 From: "Sergey A. Osokin" To: Xavier Beaudouin Message-ID: <20030710081636.GX72006@freebsd.org.ru> References: <20030709174805.GN72006@freebsd.org.ru> <07D833FA-B264-11D7-9174-000393B64262@oav.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <07D833FA-B264-11D7-9174-000393B64262@oav.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org cc: Vivek Khera Subject: Re: ports/52877: Non-Maintainer-Update: mail/postfix add support VDA softquotas patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 08:16:39 -0000 On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 01:21:12AM +0200, Xavier Beaudouin wrote: > Le mercredi, 9 jul 2003, ? 19:48 Europe/Paris, Sergey A. Osokin a ?crit > >On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 06:44:23PM +0200, Xavier Beaudouin wrote: > >>Le mercredi, 9 jul 2003, ? 18:38 Europe/Paris, Sergey A. Osokin a > >>>On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 12:33:18PM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote: > >>>>>>>>>"XB" == Xavier Beaudouin writes: > >>>> > >>>>XB> Here is the patch for 2.0.13, notice that it is also available > >>>>at > >>>>XB> http://www.oav.net/vda/postfix.patch as well > >>>> > >>>>Looks ok to me, except I disagree with the bump of PORTREVISION. It > >>>>is not necessary since no existing installations are affected. > >>> > >>>Hmm, I think Xavier Beaudouin add new functionality to this port, > >>>and the right way is bump PORTREVISION, isn't it? > >> > >>Bumping PORTREVISION may not be necessary... Since I added new > >>functionnality I was thinking it is a good idea. But this part for me > >>is not really important for me... > > > >OK. Another problem is place for patch postfix-2.0.13.v2.patch.gz and > >I think it must be at ports/distfiles/postfix, right? > >If answer is yes, I have a following: > >$ make > >===> Extracting for postfix-2.0.13,1 > >>>Checksum OK for postfix/postfix-2.0.13.tar.gz. > >>>Checksum OK for postfix/postfix-2.0.13.v2.patch.gz. > >===> Patching for postfix-2.0.13,1 > >===> Applying distribution patches for postfix-2.0.13,1 > >File to patch: > > > >Any idea? > > Really strange, because on my test machine it is in distsfiles/postfix > and it is compiling.... > > Ok I see I forgot a : > echo "PATCH_STRIP= -p1" in the configure.postfix file. > > It was working because I used IPv6TLS patch as well... But don't works for me. Looks like you talk about PATCH_DIST_STRIP= -p1? -- Rgdz, /"\ ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN Sergey Osokin aka oZZ, \ / AGAINST HTML MAIL http://ozz.pp.ru/ X AND NEWS / \