From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 26 19:16:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DFEA16A4CA for ; Sun, 26 Nov 2006 19:16:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perikillo@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 481E543FCC for ; Sun, 26 Nov 2006 19:05:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from perikillo@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so1833863nfc for ; Sun, 26 Nov 2006 11:06:10 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=sNC2qCMt7t5l0z2gSRkoLkXezSKzzEbugl86ykTJlXwEKBW+4MCxR+j/COjD1XJpQJtyzQDePGy0OX3rQjxLtmNIsoI9lChvPj/pkdAgPdEOhnM5GRDU4jy1rXEvrZH944Cdrw9JFBTGx7jms/9nEFAfrZI4NXhOXo6HmXsm81o= Received: by 10.82.101.3 with SMTP id y3mr1845196bub.1164567968915; Sun, 26 Nov 2006 11:06:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.178.5 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Nov 2006 11:06:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <51d7a5160611261106r10969d80g7b97d3925e822623@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 11:06:08 -0800 From: perikillo To: "FreeBSD Mailing List" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <499c70c0611260212sa53a2bcq6345f063b7bfdddf@mail.gmail.com> <499c70c0611260832m448702e8yaf660e73c08da0de@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.2: ULE vs 4BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 19:16:51 -0000 On 11/26/06, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > > On 11/26/06, John Smith wrote: > > On 11/26/06, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > > > On 11/26/06, John Smith wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > What shall I use as a scheduler on it? 4BSD or ULE? > > > > > > The general consensus is you should not touch ULE unless > > > you're a developer willing to fix some outstanding issues and > > > maybe take active maintainership of it. > > > > > > You can try it just for the fun of it, but your problem reports > > > will be met by a grinning "we told you so". > > > > > > > Thank you Andrew, > > > > I'm asking because I downloaded PC-BSD 1.3 Beta which is based on > > FreeBSD 6.1 and the default in kernel is ULE, so I wanted to make > > sure. > > That's strange. I've used ULE for months on many boxes, but > much as I like it, I have to admit there are serious problems > with it. There are different reports, but it's clear you can't use > it in production environments. It might be okay to run it on your > {desk,lap}top system, though, but PC-BSD developers have > yet to comment on their reasoning. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I recommende not to use the ULE for production, months ago, my backup server start crashing, until someone told me to disable ULE_ and enable the old 4BSD scheduler, check this posts: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2006-October/132966.html My system back to normal after i disable ULE. Greetings.