From owner-freebsd-arch Sat Oct 6 5:34:45 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26F6437B403; Sat, 6 Oct 2001 05:34:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bde.zeta.org.au (bde.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.102]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA32447; Sat, 6 Oct 2001 22:34:37 +1000 Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2001 22:33:56 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: Robert Watson , Peter Wemm , Subject: Re: Removing ptrace(2)'s dependency on procfs(5) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20011006222940.Y824-100000@delplex.bde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 6 Oct 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Robert Watson writes: > > (1) Actually, this is a duplicate of an out-of-band one: using > > procfs_rwmem() as a function name in sys_process.c still jibes: are > > you sure you don't want to rename it now rather than waiting? :-) > > How does ptrace_rwmem() sound? Slightly worse :-). proc_rwmem() is the best I can think of now. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message