From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 18 16:39:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E510E16A4CE for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:39:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.bayarea.net [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA77B43D31 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:39:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2J0dXae062921; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:39:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@ns1.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i2J0dXRY062920; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:39:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:39:33 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Garance A Drosihn Message-ID: <20040319003933.GB62814@ns1.xcllnt.net> References: <40594A35.6060303@exeter.ac.uk> <200403190005.22811.wmmh@identd.net> <200403190057.36638.wmmh@identd.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: "Wafa M. Hadidi" Subject: Re: Updating sparc64 time_t, hostname not found X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:39:34 -0000 On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 06:35:44PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > > Re-check > grep __time_t /usr/src/sys/sparc64/include/_types.h > > (again) just to make sure it's 32-bit, and then redo the: IIRC the source tree was synced, so I expect to see a 64-bit typedef. If it's a 32-bit time_t, the source tree is not up-to-date. In that case a whole lot of cans and worms (in various relations to each other) enter the picture and the outcome of using that source tree is pretty much undefined (from where I'm sitting). -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net