Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 23:59:13 +0100 From: John Marino <freebsdml@marino.st> To: grog@FreeBSD.org, FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Discussions in closed PRs Message-ID: <56B91DC1.4030808@marino.st>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Geez, talk about being misrepresented. "that marino@ wants to remove portmaster and replace it with synth. This PR was just preparing the way." What part of this is accurate? Nothing. I wanted to remove THE DOCUMENTATION *if* portmaster remains in the current state. I tried to DEPRECATE it without expiration. At no time did I try or state I wanted to remove portmaster. I never said I wanted to replace it with Synth. I said that a main objective was to provide a tool with the same functionlity (aside this means end result, not process) "Against portmaster: it's not maintained (hasn't been for 9 Whole Months), and it has open PRs (3 of them," Another misrepresention. Pi counted 12 earlier today (and they still show in a search so not sure what you did) and you could bet there would be more if it had a maintainer. Actually I don't appreciate this message or the one before. I would have brought Synth on when I was ready which would have been AFTER release 1.00. I didn't ask for any of this and I certaintly didn't to be misrepresented. The PR continued because in my opinion Warren closed it down very hastily and did not even ask the submitted if they were happy with the solution (I suspect it was a case of "don't ask questions you don't want the answer to). Anyway, on the premise of this inaccurate post, let's NOT discuss it. John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?56B91DC1.4030808>