From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 22 14:40:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2CE816A4CE for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 14:40:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpauth09.mail.atl.earthlink.net (smtpauth09.mail.atl.earthlink.net [209.86.89.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8822243D4C for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 14:40:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from [206.255.31.21] (helo=[192.168.63.10]) by smtpauth09.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.34) id 1DDkYj-0000LL-S4; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:40:41 -0500 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 08:40:49 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <686409441.20050321194550@wanadoo.fr> <1135566054.20050322102902@wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <1135566054.20050322102902@wanadoo.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200503220840.49778.algould@datawok.com> X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69563f9fea00a6dd62bc281c8caf86983f0503630cf0c33eaecf350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 206.255.31.21 cc: Anthony Atkielski Subject: Re: MS Exchange server on FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 14:40:43 -0000 On Tuesday 22 March 2005 03:29 am, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Ted Mittelstaedt writes: > > You have no proof of that unless you were to run the tests that I > > already posted. > > You're wasting my time. Perhaps somebody who actually understands how > FreeBSD works will offer useful assistance sooner or later, although > I'm less and less optimistic. No, Anthony, if you've wasted ours. By now, you could have performed the suggested upgrades; and the proof of whether they made a difference would be known. If you're so sure of yourself, why not perform the upgrades and prove your point? Even if the upgrades didn't fix the problem, the changes may have resulted in additional information for those who have tried to help you. Even if the upgrades were irrelevant to your problems, your system might benefit from them after the problems are fixed. You've spent all this time on argumentation rather than progress. If you are convinced that FreeBSD is flawed and its community is closed-minded; maybe FreeBSD isn't the best OS for your purposes. Perhaps you should return to Windows NT. Perhaps you should try Linux, which has more commercial support. Whatever you decide, please do something constructive.