From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 26 08:32:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00FF916A421 for ; Thu, 26 May 2005 08:32:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from pumice6.sentex.ca (pumice6.sentex.ca [64.7.153.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 832C143D1F for ; Thu, 26 May 2005 08:32:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by pumice6.sentex.ca (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j4Q8WBqq075004; Thu, 26 May 2005 04:32:11 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from simian.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j4Q8W4Wt093331; Thu, 26 May 2005 04:32:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <6.2.1.2.0.20050526043124.058b1e50@64.7.153.2> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.1.2 Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 04:32:53 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: <20050526040741.GA68105@keyslapper.net> References: <20050525162419.GB47179@keyslapper.net> <20050526040741.GA68105@keyslapper.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 64.7.153.21 Cc: Louis LeBlanc Subject: Re: USB 2.0 (ehci) and Intel ICH5 in 5.4? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 08:32:13 -0000 At 12:07 AM 26/05/2005, Louis LeBlanc wrote: >On 05/25/05 07:48 PM, Mike Tancsa sat at the `puter and typed: > > On Wed, 25 May 2005 12:24:20 -0400, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions > > you wrote: > > > > Upgrade to RELENG_5. There have been a lot of bug fixes to the USB > > subsystem and USB 2.0 works far better. > >I'm not sure I'm ready to put RELENG_5 on this machine. I prefer to >have a specific release and make upgrades a little more carefully. 5.4R would be good enough to get all the USB bug fixes / enhancements. ---Mike