From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 24 02:40:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF8B816A41F for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 02:40:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6209143D7B for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 02:40:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5807B1A3C29; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 18:40:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A0F88528C8; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 21:40:33 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 21:40:33 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Russell Meek Message-ID: <20051124024033.GB13075@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <4384E8F6.6070308@russellmeek.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0ntfKIWw70PvrIHh" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4384E8F6.6070308@russellmeek.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE Scheduler FreeBSD 6 - Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 02:40:49 -0000 --0ntfKIWw70PvrIHh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 05:11:02PM -0500, Russell Meek wrote: > Is anyone here currently using the *SCHED_ULE* scheduler in a server=20 > enviroment, production or non? >=20 > Pros? Cons? This question has been asked quite often, so you would have done well to research the answer before asking :)=20 It's slower on the workloads I've tested and is not stable on machines with many CPUs (e.g. 12). Kris --0ntfKIWw70PvrIHh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDhSghWry0BWjoQKURAqW3AKDSfqLiRo3a3mCuGqT53S5skoyBFwCfQm3k i+DANzZAa9QsaXZSchIAi9A= =05Ed -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0ntfKIWw70PvrIHh--