From owner-freebsd-current  Tue May 14 18:08:31 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id SAA29762
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 14 May 1996 18:08:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au (pp@bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au [130.102.2.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id SAA29755
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 14 May 1996 18:08:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au by bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au 
          id <20949-0@bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au>; Wed, 15 May 1996 11:00:13 +1000
Received: from netfl15a.devetir.qld.gov.au 
          by pandora.devetir.qld.gov.au (8.6.10/DEVETIR-E0.3a) with ESMTP 
          id KAA16437; Wed, 15 May 1996 10:18:31 +1000
Received: from localhost by netfl15a.devetir.qld.gov.au (8.6.8.1/DEVETIR-0.1) 
          id AAA11369; Wed, 15 May 1996 00:18:18 GMT
Message-Id: <199605150018.AAA11369@netfl15a.devetir.qld.gov.au>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.5 12/11/95
To: John Birrell <cimaxp1!jb@melb.werple.net.au>
cc: beta@xfree86.org, current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: libc_r threads doco?
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 10 May 1996 18:12:13 +1000." <199605100811.SAA11845@melb.werple.net.au>
X-Face: 3}heU+2?b->-GSF-G4T4>jEB9~FR(V9lo&o>kAy=Pj&;oVOc<|pr%I/VSG"ZD32J>5gGC0N 
        7gj]^GI@M:LlqNd]|(2OxOxy@$6@/!,";-!OlucF^=jq8s57$%qXd/ieC8DhWmIy@J1AcnvSGV\|*! 
        >Bvu7+0h4zCY^]{AxXKsDTlgA2m]fX$W@'8ev-Qi+-;%L'CcZ'NBL!@n?}q!M&Em3*eW7,093nOeV8 
        M)(u+6D;%B7j\XA/9j4!Gj~&jYzflG[#)E9sI&Xe9~y~Gn%fA7>F:YKr"Wx4cZU*6{^2ocZ!YyR
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 15 May 1996 10:18:16 +1000
From: Stephen Hocking <sysseh@devetir.qld.gov.au>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

John Birrell <cimaxp1!jb@melb.werple.net.au> said...
> Stephen Hocking <sysseh@devetir.qld.gov.au> said...
> > 
> > Anyone got any idea where to find a paper on the variety of threads used in 
> > libc_r under FreeBSD - current? Are they pthread compliant?
> 
> At the moment they're closer to draft 4 of POSIX 1003.1c than draft 10
> (the latest). I've got a local version that is closer, but not quite 
> there yet... I've had no time to work on this lately.
> 

The reason I'm asking is that X11R6 allows one to build a threaded X library, 
and I was curious to know how much brute force I'd have to use in order to 
glue the two together. The libc_r stuff is not built by default in -current 
when one does a "make world" yet, so I gues it would have to be something set 
in your site.def.

	Stephen
-- 
The views expressed above are not those of the Worker's Compensation Board of
Queensland, Australia.