From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Aug 26 21:25:16 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E225316A4CF
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>;
	Thu, 26 Aug 2004 21:25:15 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from web52305.mail.yahoo.com (web52305.mail.yahoo.com
	[206.190.39.100])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5971643D62
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>;
	Thu, 26 Aug 2004 21:25:15 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from wevake@yahoo.com)
Message-ID: <20040826212514.26993.qmail@web52305.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [65.213.101.250] by web52305.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP;
	Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:25:14 PDT
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:25:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: Vivek Pandey <wevake@yahoo.com>
To: linimon@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <200408262116.i7QLGK1n086445@freefall.freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1
Subject: Re: ports/71005: bug in libsem
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 21:25:16 -0000

Hi,
I am new to freebsd...donno where to classify. I downloaded this libsem(POSIX semaphoe implementation for FreeBSD) which has this bug as mentioned in the bug-report. The patch put on GNats is not the correct one...pasted the wrong code. the correct patch is attached below.
 
 
thanx,
Vivek Pandey
--------xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx------------------------
*** uthread_sem.c Thu Aug 26 17:24:48 2004
--- uthread_sem1.c Thu Aug 26 17:24:51 2004
***************
*** 113,122 ****
    retval = -1;
    goto RETURN;
   }
   pthread_mutex_unlock(&(*sem)->lock);
  
   pthread_mutex_destroy(&(*sem)->lock);
!  pthread_cond_destroy(&(*sem)->gtzero);
   (*sem)->magic = 0;
  
   free(*sem);
--- 113,124 ----
    retval = -1;
    goto RETURN;
   }
+  pthread_cond_destroy(&(*sem)->gtzero);
+  (unsigned char)(*sem)->magic = (unsigned char)(~SEM_MAGIC);
   pthread_mutex_unlock(&(*sem)->lock);
  
   pthread_mutex_destroy(&(*sem)->lock);
! 
   (*sem)->magic = 0;
  
   free(*sem);
-----xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx---------------------

Mark Linimon <linimon@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
Synopsis: bug in libsem

State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: linimon
State-Changed-When: Thu Aug 26 21:16:03 GMT 2004
State-Changed-Why: 
Is this a ports PR, or a kern PR?

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=71005

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com