From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Jan 28 21:42:06 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA24632
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 21:42:06 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [209.157.86.2])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA24623
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 21:42:05 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com)
Received: (from dillon@localhost)
	by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.2/8.9.1) id VAA00709;
	Thu, 28 Jan 1999 21:41:51 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dillon)
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 21:41:51 -0800 (PST)
From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
Message-Id: <199901290541.VAA00709@apollo.backplane.com>
To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc: julian@whistle.com, mike@smith.net.au, archie@whistle.com,
        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: btokup().. patch to STYLE(9) (fwd)
References:  <199901290225.NAA16113@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

    The changes seem pretty reasonable, to me.  I don't see why you are
    so rabid about not allowing a few extra braces for clarity.   It would
    make the code more readable. 

    Besides, a great deal of the preexisting code already uses braces 
    even in single statement if()'s... and a great deal does not.

					-Matt
					Matthew Dillon 
					<dillon@backplane.com>

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message