From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jun 29 8:33:45 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from fac13.ds.psu.edu (fac13.ds.psu.edu [146.186.61.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E775837BBFE for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 08:33:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hawk@fac13.ds.psu.edu) Received: from fac13.ds.psu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fac13.ds.psu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA38322; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 11:31:53 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from hawk@fac13.ds.psu.edu) Message-Id: <200006291531.LAA38322@fac13.ds.psu.edu> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Mark Ovens Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: star office and aplixware compared on .doc and .xls? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 28 Jun 2000 20:47:16 BST." <20000628204716.H233@parish> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 11:31:52 -0400 From: "Richard E. Hawkins" Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > I recall a year or two ago that a major new england bank actually > > switched from ms office to staroffice *because* of compatibility wiht > > .xls files--staroffice did a better job than excel. > I agree, I have a spreadsheet (Excel 95) that I need to save as HTML > evertime I update it and SO produces much nicer HTML output. Now that I think of it, I noticed the macplus emulator in the ports collection. I own excel 3 and 4, both of which beat anything available today hands down. I think I've found my solution :) hawk To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message