From owner-freebsd-current  Mon May 29 22: 7:13 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from coconut.itojun.org (coconut.itojun.org [210.160.95.97])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B92C537B68F; Mon, 29 May 2000 22:07:09 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from itojun@itojun.org)
Received: from kiwi.itojun.org (localhost.itojun.org [127.0.0.1])
	by coconut.itojun.org (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W/smtpfeed 1.06) with ESMTP id OAA22782;
	Tue, 30 May 2000 14:07:07 +0900 (JST)
To: Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de>
Cc: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@bisd.hitachi.co.jp>,
	andrews@technologist.com, Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca,
	stable@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: alex's message of Mon, 29 May 2000 17:15:07 +0200.
      <20000529171507.A1777@cichlids.cichlids.com>
X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD  90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2
Subject: Re: ftp(1) breakage w/ passive mode?
From: itojun@iijlab.net
Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 14:07:07 +0900
Message-ID: <22780.959663227@coconut.itojun.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


>> IPv4 connection via mapped address is still IPv6 connection.  In this
>> case, if ftp(1) doesn't have awareness of using mapped address, your
>> problem will occur.  And, ftp(1) seems not aware about it.
>Yes. NetBSD did that commit just right now.
>I guess they obtained it from you, or it's just a BIG coincidence.

	ume and I discussed it a little bit, directly.

itojun


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message