From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 3 14:19:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4AAD106566C for ; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 14:19:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from barney_cordoba@yahoo.com) Received: from web63902.mail.re1.yahoo.com (web63902.mail.re1.yahoo.com [69.147.97.117]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7337A8FC16 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 14:19:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from barney_cordoba@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 10641 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Mar 2009 14:19:48 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1236089988; bh=5Eb88+o3Ilhr9ZlbSJ4/pid0lT8917jf4SUeWKMuM2Y=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=cFG5qc88NBh8or0vXt2knLDTkmk2c42l5WNXDQX47pRklvMfQmTXWglf7sSKO6CaUgI1CX08eO7Hcf89XpYlDaUcMyXsfbndW1I0INuyi4PGlymz1vHRNER7AUTn3wXGPbLm2kmGVjrBuHua9ssqTXvwkyUOT1IhU3EysPmOqkw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=XzuEIdbO7d3N+62oq5iVjr4YZdnsDJSw2e60YoI/uvi1CT9PWM3KCT/fAU3FpPczeKZi+bE9CjeTVhB9JcSstZRpdDXDQ25Om8ToMp4Bs00x3KV43Rvxj6TNEQAHNwUbcRkJbVzrre72e4YgOM/kyYOKnvcV8Crdiw5wB98lHSY=; Message-ID: <552054.10376.qm@web63902.mail.re1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: a.OxRdMVM1nWklNbWfYZlgkW4kFPlySYh5Wm1Mvq.IC_ybRd6h_umlfW3x3CoRtEus6d5aNUnDesgQiQDGDfrKFjrY0YZhaEMussce73z6vER.u0oA.xJecT7r5GS3lIBiWHbigiqcPUaDQ0gqT2kGpoKKDRSFc8gpZYih7jly8AhQXJyVWOqJ8c6ODM_lzff69I5lmR20ZwQ7Y- Received: from [98.242.222.229] by web63902.mail.re1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 06:19:48 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.1 Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 06:19:48 -0800 (PST) From: Barney Cordoba To: current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Subject: Altq adulteration X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: barney_cordoba@yahoo.com List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 14:19:50 -0000 Given that 99% of high performance systems don't use altq, what was/is the reasoning to adulterate the base queuing system with ALTQ checks, rather than having altq replace the queuing/handoff routines for the small percentage of implementations that actual use it? I understand why it was initially done. What I don't understand is why antiquated shaping infrastructure remains in the base path in 7.0 and 8.0. Barney