From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jun 22 11:19:25 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12EF7106564A
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 22 Jun 2012 11:19:25 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com)
Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE3A38FC1B
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 22 Jun 2012 11:19:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (from bonomi@localhost)
	by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id q5MBJg89041285
	for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 06:19:42 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 06:19:42 -0500 (CDT)
From: Robert Bonomi <bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com>
Message-Id: <201206221119.q5MBJg89041285@mail.r-bonomi.com>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211350250.2263@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
Subject: Re: Is ZFS production ready?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 11:19:25 -0000


Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>  wrote:`
> Subject: Re: Is ZFS production ready?
>
> stick with UFS. It JUST WORKS(R), and is trusty.
> And it works fast.

Be sure to descrirbe how that is even _possible_, given that the OP needs/
wants "larger than 2tb" filesystems.