From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun May 29 22:11:56 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF52F106566B;
	Sun, 29 May 2011 22:11:56 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gavin@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98A338FC16;
	Sun, 29 May 2011 22:11:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4TMBu9X007674;
	Sun, 29 May 2011 22:11:56 GMT
	(envelope-from gavin@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gavin@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p4TMBudG007670;
	Sun, 29 May 2011 22:11:56 GMT (envelope-from gavin)
Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 22:11:56 GMT
Message-Id: <201105292211.p4TMBudG007670@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: gavin@FreeBSD.org, kmacy@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org
From: gavin@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: kern/130133: [panic] [zfs] 'kmem_map too small' caused by make
	clean
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 22:11:56 -0000

Synopsis: [panic] [zfs] 'kmem_map too small' caused by make clean

Responsible-Changed-From-To: kmacy->freebsd-fs
Responsible-Changed-By: gavin
Responsible-Changed-When: Sun May 29 22:10:27 UTC 2011
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
kmacy has asked for all of his PRs to be reassigned back to the pool.

To submitter: It is believed that this was fixed some years back, and feedback
on this was requested.  If you did provide feedback then it doesn't appear to
have made it into the PR trail - could you please resend it?


http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=130133