From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Wed Jan 29 21:02:55 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 791671FE6CF for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 21:02:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brd@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 487GCg2dKmz4BCj for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 21:02:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brd@FreeBSD.org) Received: from auth1-smtp.messagingengine.com (auth1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.227]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: brd/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 54B3BA487 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 21:02:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brd@FreeBSD.org) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailauth.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 303CD21F1E for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 16:02:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from imap2 ([10.202.2.52]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 29 Jan 2020 16:02:55 -0500 X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrfeeigddugedvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtredtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdeurhgr ugcuffgrvhhishdfuceosghrugeshfhrvggvuefuffdrohhrgheqnecuffhomhgrihhnpe hfrhgvvggsshgurdhorhhgpdgsshguihhmphdrtghomhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigv pedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegsrhgrugdomhgvshhmthhprghuthhhph gvrhhsohhnrghlihhthidqjedtjeeifedvfedvqddukedtieelieekkedqsghrugeppefh rhgvvgeuufffrdhorhhgsehsohdugehkrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id E3983E00A2; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 16:02:54 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.7-781-gfc16016-fmstable-20200127v1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <8c122948-010f-4634-94c0-43198da5e586@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2C0CC3EC-343D-4068-9E05-856A66FF175C@yahoo.com> References: <2C0CC3EC-343D-4068-9E05-856A66FF175C.ref@yahoo.com> <2C0CC3EC-343D-4068-9E05-856A66FF175C@yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 14:02:34 -0700 From: "Brad Davis" To: "Mark Millard via freebsd-arch" Subject: Re: svn commit: r356758 - in head/usr.sbin/bsdinstall: . scripts Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 21:02:55 -0000 On Wed, Jan 15, 2020, at 10:19 PM, Mark Millard via freebsd-arch wrote: > Ed Maste emaste at freebsd.org wrote on > Thu Jan 16 02:14:58 UTC 2020 : > > > On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 at 17:55, Warner Losh wrote: > > > > > > It's not i386 vs amd64 that's the issue. It's the total amount of RAM. ZFS > > > is perfectly happy with i386 installs with enough RAM. We'd catch most > > > sub-optimal cases if we'd offer it only for systems with > ~2-4GB. > > > > Very good point, defaulting to UFS for <4GB and ZFS for >=4GB sounds > > decent to me. > > I'd pick to avoid Rock64, RPi4, etc. in 4 GiByte Keep in mind, none of those use the installer so this is moot. Regards, Brad Davis