From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 13 21:13:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0180516A402; Sat, 13 May 2006 21:13:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peterjeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from mail15.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail15.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5575543D45; Sat, 13 May 2006 21:13:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peterjeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org (c220-239-19-236.belrs4.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.239.19.236]) by mail15.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4DLD8eY027710 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 14 May 2006 07:13:08 +1000 Received: from turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org (localhost.vk2pj.dyndns.org [127.0.0.1]) by turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4DLD7L0007797; Sun, 14 May 2006 07:13:07 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from peter@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k4DLD6SV007796; Sun, 14 May 2006 07:13:06 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from peter) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 07:13:06 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20060513211306.GG714@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> Mail-Followup-To: Peter Jeremy , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20060513203946.GA2050@picobyte.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060513203946.GA2050@picobyte.net> X-PGP-Key: http://members.optusnet.com.au/peterjeremy/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: Subject: Re: Has the port collection become to large to handle. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 21:13:11 -0000 On Sat, 2006-May-13 21:39:46 +0100, Shaun Amott wrote: >If bandwidth really is a problem, then it is possible - but not >necessarily a good idea - to check out individual ports via CVS. This is not supported. If you want to build ports from source, you _must_ have a complete and consistent ports tree. Otherwise you are on your own. -- Peter Jeremy