From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 19 12:35:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EF2D106567A; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 12:35:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from mx.utwente.nl (mx1.utsp.utwente.nl [130.89.2.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B5A38FC0A; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 12:35:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pieter-dev.localnet (lux.student.utwente.nl [130.89.161.112]) by mx.utwente.nl (8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id p7JC1NM7013018; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:01:23 +0200 From: Pieter de Goeje To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:01:23 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.39-2-amd64; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <810527321.20110819123700@serebryakov.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <810527321.20110819123700@serebryakov.spb.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="windows-1251" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <201108191401.23083.pieter@degoeje.nl> X-UTwente-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner. Contact icts.servicedesk@utwente.nl for more information. X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UTwente-MailScanner-From: pieter@degoeje.nl X-Spam-Status: No Cc: Vadim Goncharov , Lev Serebryakov Subject: Re: FreeBSD problems and preliminary ways to solve X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 12:35:58 -0000 On Friday, August 19, 2011 10:37:00 AM Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, Vadim. >=20 > You wrote 18 =E0=E2=E3=F3=F1=F2=E0 2011 =E3., 3:10:19: > > 3. Kernel features for complex network solutions (netgraph, carp, ipfw). > >=20 > > The niche for routers & traffic analysis is still ours. It would be > > nice to take e.g. pfSense and agree with some vendor (Netgear, > > D-Link, etc) to put on sale hardware with FreeBSD inside. >=20 > What about 10G routing? Here are reports about full-bandwidth 10G routi= ng > on modern Intel NICs with Linux (and multi-core server), but I didn't see > any such data for FreeBSD, and somebody says, that Intel drivers and > network stack is not so good parallel in FreeBSD. With regards to high speed packet forwarding and routing, check out this wo= rk=20 by Luigi Rizzo: http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/netmap/ =2D Pieter