From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 09:32:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B763E16A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:32:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 9.hellooperator.net (cpc3-cdif2-3-0-cust202.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.103.32.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EBA043D39 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:32:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rasputin@hellooperator.net) Received: from rasputin by 9.hellooperator.net with local (Exim 4.42) id 1CDJky-0003mT-B4; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 10:31:16 +0100 Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:31:16 +0100 From: Dick Davies To: Bret Walker Message-ID: <20041001093116.GB26679@lb.tenfour> References: <00bd01c4a745$348c79e0$b1336981@medill.northwestern.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <00bd01c4a745$348c79e0$b1336981@medill.northwestern.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: Rasputin cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Pam_ldap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dick Davies List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 09:32:17 -0000 * Bret Walker [1028 00:28]: > I've been trying all day to get pam_ldap to authenticate an ssh session > against Active Directory. I thought that I had found the perfect HOWTO > (read: one that didn't require nss_ldap), but its instructions didn't seem > to get it working on my system. >=20 > I've read that can authenticate to AD with pam_ldap alone, and I've read > that you can't, as well. Does anyone have any experience doing this w/o > nss_ldap. I'm running 4.10, and I don't think it has support for > nss_ldap. >=20 > If anyone has any advice, I'd love to hear it. You're not going to need nss_ldap if you just want to validate a password. But it sounds a bit odd to have existing users in /etc/passwd and only have the password itself from AD - and if the users don't exist in /etc/passwd the system won't be able to log them in. What was the howto you used? --=20 I think it is true for all _=08n. I was just playing it safe with _=08n >= =3D 3 because I couldn't remember the proof. -- Baker, Pure Math 351a Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns