From owner-cvs-usrsbin Thu May 8 20:18:08 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA06699 for cvs-usrsbin-outgoing; Thu, 8 May 1997 20:18:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from punt-1.mail.demon.net (punt-2a.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id UAA06672; Thu, 8 May 1997 20:17:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from awfulhak.demon.co.uk ([158.152.17.1]) by punt-1.mail.demon.net id aa0619013; 9 May 97 1:31 BST Received: from awfulhak.demon.co.uk (localhost.lan.awfulhak.org [127.0.0.1]) by awfulhak.demon.co.uk (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA01322; Fri, 9 May 1997 01:26:17 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: <199705090026.BAA01322@awfulhak.demon.co.uk> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96 To: Joerg Wunsch cc: Brian Somers , CVS-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-usrsbin@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/newsyslog newsyslog.8 newsyslog.c In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 08 May 1997 14:31:34 +0200." <19970508143134.FV57371@uriah.heep.sax.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 09 May 1997 01:26:17 +0100 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-cvs-usrsbin@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > As Brian Somers wrote: > > > Can someone take a look at the paragraph I added in newsyslog.8 ? > > It's skipping a line just above the first mention of > > path_to_pid_file, and I can't figure out why :( > > You mean the empty line above it? That's just a ``page break'', > something you gotta live with (or fix nroff or the -mdoc macros, i > suppose). Even nroff includes one blank line where it think a new > `page' starts. > > It's probably a bug in -mdoc. You can see the page break at exact the > same location (line 65) e.g. in the description of the -k option to > ls(1), while (just to pick another random example) the man page of > sh(1) doesn't experience this effect. This makes me feel beter - a bit. Surely this sort of stuff should be done in a "mangle doc | pr" sort of way, so that the user can have control over the "pr" bit. Does the groff -man bit do the "I know what a page is" bit ? If so, isn't this in the wrong place ? Maybe the "man" pipeline should be something like tbl | groff -Wall -mtty-char -Tascii -man | col | pr $PRARGS | $PAGER where the pr bit is new..... > -- > cheers, J"org > > joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE > Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) -- Brian , Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour....