From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Sep 27 11:32:22 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA25180 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Sun, 27 Sep 1998 11:32:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from haldjas.folklore.ee (Haldjas.folklore.ee [193.40.6.121]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA25172 for ; Sun, 27 Sep 1998 11:32:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee) Received: from haldjas.folklore.ee (haldjas.folklore.ee [172.17.2.1] (may be forged)) by haldjas.folklore.ee (8.8.8/8.8.4) with SMTP id VAA12262; Sun, 27 Sep 1998 21:31:56 +0300 (EEST) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1998 21:31:55 +0300 (EEST) From: Narvi To: "David E. Cross" cc: Studded , The Subject: Re: COMPAT_43 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 27 Sep 1998, David E. Cross wrote: > > > > xterm AFAIK used to be one that needed it. It has probably been corrected > > since. > > > what if you built X from source? > I doubt it matters. If it uses "legacy" 4.3 interfaces, it will only run on a kernel which was compiled with COMPAT_43. Like if it needs /usr/include/sys/ioctl_compat.h or uses (I think) the creat syscall or the like. > (Anyway I am going to try and see how it works.) > It can very well be that that xterm has since been modified to not need it. I haven't tried and there certainly was time when COMPAT_43 was needed for it (in 2.1 timeframe). > -- > David Cross > > Sander There is no love, no good, no happiness and no future - all these are just illusions. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message