Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 30 May 2012 10:38:35 -0700
From:      Vijay Singh <vijju.singh@gmail.com>
To:        Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Damien Fleuriot <ml@my.gd>
Subject:   Re: Intel 1G Tx hangs
Message-ID:  <CALCNsJRWtaJKE4Zwt1=5Eiz_110tDx3V4_9%2BMSHwvsGjeeZQaA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACqU3MUCONq79XA-m=56FFf6HcpJSaCM2J640S0mEtkjJ30p5A@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CALCNsJS3X2Oa608ZEo58ip2mXs3vjJNYJfEdyxade=nyd2OCBw@mail.gmail.com> <4FC6547A.2040308@my.gd> <CACqU3MUCONq79XA-m=56FFf6HcpJSaCM2J640S0mEtkjJ30p5A@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> Running 20ish guests in KVM with emulated e1000 cards and doing fine.
>>
> lucky you! I've been seeing complete RX failure with multiple emulated
> e1000 in qemu guest, cf kern/168246. It did not seem to have yet
> picked much interest from maintainer...
>
> =A0- Arnaud
>
>> Got a few physical ones in production as well, no hangs here.

FYI, I updated our 8.2 code base to 8-stable e1k drivers and things
appear to have stabilized.

@jfv, the if_lem.c version did change from 1.0.1 to 1.0.4.

-vijay



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALCNsJRWtaJKE4Zwt1=5Eiz_110tDx3V4_9%2BMSHwvsGjeeZQaA>