From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 30 17:38:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C3CD106564A for ; Wed, 30 May 2012 17:38:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vijju.singh@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2ADC8FC0C for ; Wed, 30 May 2012 17:38:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbro2 with SMTP id ro2so286707pbb.13 for ; Wed, 30 May 2012 10:38:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4hnBUi/ruzp95p8fYIDmiCgwFcjq9RtC1Br4ydWLMIs=; b=WIkF4XlG3zTk6zdbDoRcTDaI69V8JTErROAmhazqBfE5i4VY2FQAL8V7jkjiIgWMQz KbLP1gk4taHX7Ww2GVTY7Pta5KxwY20aqPeDcJ8lfFzYmKAccy1qkIlSVsQ9HJb0JGdD TaveqczoaIlDq0BHiz7ZQ4zLpC0lm5i4P1emOQYwqIUiVY+ot+b8UA2vcmTT0ZhKIJfa IbVvyO9DlJDXlr4zAUJQ6VPe6OY/oZ+ECoHxqiHy+1W+oWMLfyVPWrGEyvRIHvMH3kbL ma0zA/83fbySp1bRtzDoBJ6g+IngFahByB0rve/Gzi9iKTgbDGRhhMnNFJPUuF2X3Ucu YItA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.193.233 with SMTP id hr9mr51293672pbc.99.1338399515498; Wed, 30 May 2012 10:38:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.165.21 with HTTP; Wed, 30 May 2012 10:38:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4FC6547A.2040308@my.gd> Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 10:38:35 -0700 Message-ID: From: Vijay Singh To: Arnaud Lacombe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Damien Fleuriot Subject: Re: Intel 1G Tx hangs X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 17:38:36 -0000 >> Running 20ish guests in KVM with emulated e1000 cards and doing fine. >> > lucky you! I've been seeing complete RX failure with multiple emulated > e1000 in qemu guest, cf kern/168246. It did not seem to have yet > picked much interest from maintainer... > > =A0- Arnaud > >> Got a few physical ones in production as well, no hangs here. FYI, I updated our 8.2 code base to 8-stable e1k drivers and things appear to have stabilized. @jfv, the if_lem.c version did change from 1.0.1 to 1.0.4. -vijay