From owner-freebsd-alpha Sun Sep 20 12:39:18 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA23318 for freebsd-alpha-outgoing; Sun, 20 Sep 1998 12:39:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from nlsystems.com (nlsys.demon.co.uk [158.152.125.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA23269 for ; Sun, 20 Sep 1998 12:38:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com) Received: from herring.nlsystems.com (herring.nlsystems.com [10.0.0.2]) by nlsystems.com (8.9.1/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA05078; Sun, 20 Sep 1998 19:38:56 GMT Date: Sun, 20 Sep 1998 20:38:55 +0100 (BST) From: Doug Rabson To: Chris Csanady cc: Andrew Gallatin , freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IDE support? In-Reply-To: <199809201836.NAA02240@friley-185-114.res.iastate.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 20 Sep 1998, Chris Csanady wrote: > > > Another thing--does anyone know if it is possible to get SRM on > > > the Samsung UX2 boards? (Or even if their PCI is as horrible > > > broken as it is on the LX?) > > > >Based on a conversation at USENIX with somebody from Harddata, I don't > >think the SRM console will be available for the UX series. > > > >Ack! Are all LX boards horribly broken? I was assuming they'd be like > >Miatas, and brand new boards would have a newer revision 21174.. > > As far as I can tell. :( I just had a chance to play with the Rev C0 > boards, and they still suck just as much. I believe the C0 is the > latest rev, although I am not absolutely sure. In what sense are they broken? I have a 164LX and (barring the time the heatsink fell off) it has been working very well. -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 181 951 1891 Fax: +44 181 381 1039 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message