Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 10 Feb 2000 12:49:43 -0500 (EST)
From:      Lyndon Griffin <lgriffin@bsd4us.org>
To:        freebsd-sparc@freebsd.org
Subject:   Cross-compiler question
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSO.4.10.10002101244260.30411-100000@ns.bsd4us.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
OK - so, everything is looking good for me getting a working toolchain up
from FreeBSD 3.4 to sparc-netbsd (32-bit toolchain, though 64-bit
shouldn't be much different).  As soon as I get it done, I am going to
publish the steps to getting it done as well as probably make a tarball or
package or something that people can use to skip all the fancy hacking
necessary to get it working ;)

I have one question, and it's probably a stupid one, but it's got me
stumped...  Scenario:  I'm building the toolchain to install in
/usr/sparc.  So far, I've had to copy /usr/include to /usr/sparc/include
and set appropriate flags in the makefiles.  Everything seems to be going
ok, until I get into the actual gcc compiling.  At this point, it seems
relectant to look in /usr/include or /usr/sparc/include for any of the
files that I've placed there.  I keep having to hard-code things like
this:

changing

#include <stdlib.h>

to

#include "/usr/sparc/include/stdlib.h"

to get things moving along.  As this is usually A Bad Thing (tm), and
since I'm sure there's a better way to make this happen, can anyone shed
any light?

Thanks,

<:)  Lyndon Griffin
http://www.bsd4us.org



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSO.4.10.10002101244260.30411-100000>