From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 23 21:36:54 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A5D114F for ; Thu, 23 May 2013 21:36:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ray@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.dlink.ua (smtp.dlink.ua [193.138.187.146]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D012F26D for ; Thu, 23 May 2013 21:36:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rnote.ddteam.net (205-91-135-95.pool.ukrtel.net [95.135.91.205]) (Authenticated sender: ray) by smtp.dlink.ua (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AA2DBC4936; Fri, 24 May 2013 00:29:34 +0300 (EEST) Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 00:29:30 +0300 From: Aleksandr Rybalko To: Ruslan Bukin Subject: Re: [CFT] Exynos5250 Message-Id: <20130524002930.ae914ff2.ray@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20130523150155.GA10587@mail.bsdpad.com> References: <20130523150155.GA10587@mail.bsdpad.com> Organization: FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.2 (GTK+ 2.24.5; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) X-Operating-System: FreeBSD Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: arm@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 21:36:54 -0000 On Thu, 23 May 2013 15:01:55 +0000 Ruslan Bukin wrote: > Hi! > > I'm happy to introduce freebsd/arm port for Samsung Exynos processors. > THe port covers initial, very limited support for Exynos5250 > and includes: GIC, ARMv7 Generic Timer, USB EHCI, UART. > Clocks still handled by uboot. > > For develop and tests I used Arndale Board and u-boot by linaro > (git://git.linaro.org/boot/u-boot-linaro-stable.git) > > One thing that stumped me for a while is that the interrupt controller > driver, gic.c, do works with Group 0 (secure) type of interrupts, > but u-boot switches them all to be in Group 1 (non-secure). > So I had to switch them back in gic.c. > > Big thanks to ray@ for help and understanding. Thanks, Ray! :) No, it's your work, so Thank you! I did hints only :) > > code lives here: > http://hg.bsdpad.com/ > > Known problems: > 1. If specify more than 512MB RAM then panic occurs: > panic: kmem_suballoc: bad status return of 3 > 2. SMP code exists, but don't properly works due to some > problems in SMP on arm > > -Ruslan > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Aleksandr Rybalko