From owner-freebsd-bugs  Sat Oct 28 15:11:11 1995
Return-Path: owner-bugs
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id PAA02850
          for bugs-outgoing; Sat, 28 Oct 1995 15:11:11 -0700
Received: from ast.com (irvine.ast.com [165.164.128.2])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with SMTP id PAA02832
          ; Sat, 28 Oct 1995 15:11:05 -0700
Received: from fw.ast.com by ast.com with SMTP id AA05949
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5); Sat, 28 Oct 1995 15:12:14 -0700
Received: from nemesis by fw.ast.com with uucp
	(Smail3.1.29.1 #4) id m0t9JOP-000087C; Sat, 28 Oct 95 17:06 CDT
Received: by nemesis.lonestar.org (Smail3.1.27.1 #19)
	id m0t9JDP-000IyNC; Sat, 28 Oct 95 16:54 WET DST
Message-Id: <m0t9JDP-000IyNC@nemesis.lonestar.org>
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 95 16:54 WET DST
To: pst@freefall.freebsd.org, freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org
From: uhclem%nemesis@fw.ast.com (Frank Durda IV)
Sent: Sat Oct 28 1995, 16:54:58 CDT
Subject: Re: bin/316
Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

[0]Synopsis: SNAP950322 less stable on IDE than earlier releases FDIV009
[0]
[0]State-Changed-From-To: open-feedback
[0]State-Changed-By: pst
[0]State-Changed-When: Sat Oct 28 12:55:33 PDT 1995
[0]State-Changed-Why: 
[0]How is the system behaving these days?  Can we close this out?

Wow, I thought this one had been closed long ago.  Looking back through
my notes, it cleared up at 2.0.5-ALPHA, so this issue is very closed, IMHO.
Close that baby.

Frank Durda IV <uhclem@nemesis.lonestar.org>|"The Knights who say "LETNi"
or uhclem%nemesis@fw.ast.com (Fastest Route)| demand...  A SEGMENT REGISTER!!!"
...letni!rwsys!nemesis!uhclem               |"A what?"
...decvax!fw.ast.com!nemesis!uhclem         |"LETNi! LETNi! LETNi!"  - 1983